Laproscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy

No statistical significance between complication rates for laproscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared to total abdominal hsterectomy

Citation/s:
American Journal Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume 180, Number 2 pp270-274
Lead author's name and fax: Riccardo Marana

Three-part Clinical Question: Are there more complications in patients requiring laproscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy compared with total abdominal hysterectomy.
Search Terms: Medline search used. Terms used : Laproscopic hysterectomy 102 citations Abdominal and laproscopic hysterectomies 28 citations

The Study:
Non-blinded randomised controlled trial with intention-to-treat.
The Study Patients: Patients had to have one or more of the following:- Uterine size 280g to 700g, previous pelvic surgery, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, moderate or severe endometriosis, concomitant adnexal masses or indication for adnexectomy, nulliparity with lack of uterine descent and limited vaginal access.
Control group (N=58; 58 analysed): Total abdominal hysterectomy
Experimental group (N=58; 58 analysed): Laproscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy

The Evidence:

Outcome Time to Outcome CER EER RRR ARR NNT
Major Complications 0.034 0.017 50% 0.017 59
95% Confidence Intervals: -100% to 100% -0.040 to 0.074 NNT=13 to INF; NNH=25 to INF
Minor Complications 0.086 0.034 60% 0.052 19
95% Confidence Intervals: -39% to 100% -0.034 to 0.138 NNT=7 to INF; NNH=29 to INF

Comments:
Study also showed that there was no difference in operating time between abdominal and laproscopically assisted hysterectomies. The intra-operative blood loss and postoperative day 1 haemoglobin drop were less in the laproscopic group. Postoperative pain and hospital stay were also reduced in the laproscopic group.

Appraised by: Esther Moss Birmingham Women's Hospital Edgbaston; Thursday, October 07, 1999
Email:
Kill or Update By: January 2000